The two-phase evaluation is the industry default. You reach a target in phase one, then reach a second target under the same or similar limits. The point of the second phase is not difficulty — it is repetition.
Phase counts and rule sets differ between firms even inside the same model. Read a current example while the explanation below is fresh.
Phase two exists to distinguish a good run from a repeatable process. A trader can reach almost any single target with enough risk; doing it twice in sequence, without breaching a loss limit in between, is much harder to achieve by luck. If your edge is genuine, the second phase is the one that works in your favour.
Because it is the default, the two-step format gives you the widest choice of provider, which in turn makes rule sets easier to compare like for like. That comparability is worth something: it is far easier to judge whether a drawdown model is reasonable when several firms offer the same structure around it.
Traders routinely arrive at phase two with the same aggression that got them through phase one, having treated the first target as the finish line. Plan both phases as one attempt with one risk budget. Whatever risk-per-trade figure your daily loss limit implies applies just as much on the second phase as the first.
Suits you if
Probably not if
If the list above describes you, the next step is the firm's own terms — that is where the phase structure and limits for this model are actually stated.
The model determines the shape of the test. Your position sizing relative to the daily loss limit determines whether you survive it.
How to pass a challengeProviders change which formats they sell. Confirm availability and terms on the firm's own funding options page.
All six providers below publish their current phase structures and rule sets on their own sites. Read the terms there rather than relying on a summary.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. If you purchase through one of these links, we may earn a commission at no additional cost to you. Our recommendations are based on the factors explained on each page.
Forex · Metals · Indices · Energies · Crypto
Evaluation-based funding across forex and CFD markets. Current phase structure, targets and drawdown terms are published on the firm's challenge page.
Forex
Long-running forex funding provider with more than one programme type. Compare the programmes on the firm's site before choosing.
Forex · Metals · Indices · Oil
Evaluation programmes for forex and CFD traders. Rule details are listed on the firm's own signup flow.
Forex · CFDs
Offers several challenge formats. Check the checkout page for the account sizes and rule sets currently on sale.
Forex · CFDs
Challenge selection is configured directly in the firm's new-challenge screen, where the current terms are shown.
Futures
Futures-focused evaluation accounts. Contract limits and drawdown model are set out on the firm's site.
Fee, target, drawdown model, time limits and reset terms are all published by the firm and change often. Read them at the source.
One-step challenges
A single evaluation phase before funding.
Instant funding
No evaluation phase — funded from purchase.
Or go straight to the side-by-side comparison.
Check current rules on
FundingPips